Support our educational content for free when you purchase through links on our site. Learn more
📊 3D Printing Statistics 2020: The Data That Changed Everything
When the world ground to a halt in 2020, the 3D printing industry didn’t just keep moving; it sprinted. While traditional supply chains crumbled under the weight of global lockdowns, a quiet revolution was happening in garages, maker spaces, and hospitals. We’re talking about a year where face shields were printed faster than they could be shipped, and ventilator valves saved lives in hours rather than weeks. But beyond the heartwarming stories of community resilience, what did the hard numbers actually say? Did the market crash, or did it explode?
In this deep dive, we’re peling back the layers of the 2020 3D printing market, analyzing everything from the Creality Ender 3 dominance in the consumer sector to the aerospace giants adopting metal printing at record rates. We’ll reveal why resin printing suddenly became the darling of the miniature community, how healthcare became the industry’s new backbone, and which materials saw the most dramatic growth. You might be surprised to learn that despite the pandemic, the global market value didn’t just hold steady—it surged, defying all economic logic.
Ready to see how the data from 2020 predicts the future of manufacturing? Keep reading to uncover the Top 10 Technologies, the Regional Breakdowns, and the Material Shifts that defined a pivotal year in additive manufacturing history.
Key Takeaways
- Market Resilience: Despite global economic turmoil, the 3D printing market grew by approximately 15-20% in 2020, reaching a valuation of $12.8 billion.
- The Pandemic Pivot: The industry shifted from a hobbyist novelty to a critical supply chain solution, with a 30%+ surge in emergency medical and PE production.
- Technology Dominance: FDM/FFF remained the king of volume (60%+ share), while SLA/DLP saw explosive growth in the consumer and dental sectors.
- Material Evolution: PETG and TPU overtook traditional ABS for functional parts, and biocompatible resins became the standard for medical applications.
- Regional Leaders: The USA led in R&D and revenue, China dominated hardware unit sales, and Germany remained the powerhouse for industrial SLS and metal printing.
Table of Contents
- ⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
- 📜 From Sci-Fi to Reality: A Brief History of 3D Printing Statistics
- 📊 The 2020 3D Printing Market Size and Growth Trajectory
- 🏠Top 10 3D Printing Technologies Dominating the Industry in 2020
- 🌍 Regional Breakdown: Where Was 3D Printing Happening in 2020?
- 🏥 Healthcare Revolution: 3D Printing Statistics in Medicine and Dentistry
- 🏗️ Aerospace and Automotive: How 2020 Data Shaped Heavy Industry
- đź§Ş Material Matters: Utilization of Resins, Filaments, and Powders in 2020
- 🚀 Fast-Growing 3D Printing Materials That Took Over the Market
- 🏢 Key Players: The Top 3D Printing Companies by Revenue and Innovation
- 🖨️ Consumer vs. Industrial: 3D Printer Sales and Adoption Rates in 2020
- đź’° Cost Analysis: How Much Did 3D Printing Actually Cost in 2020?
- đź”® Future Outlook: What the 2020 Data Predicts for the Next Decade
- âť“ Frequently Asked Questions About 2020 3D Printing Data
- âś… Conclusion
- đź”— Recommended Links
- 📚 Reference Links
⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
Before we dive into the deep end of the data ocean, let’s hit the high notes with some bite-sized truths about the 3D printing landscape in 2020. If you’re wondering how the world of additive manufacturing looked when the pandemic hit, you’re in the right place.
- The Pandemic Pivot: 2020 wasn’t just a year of statistics; it was a year of survival. 3D printing went from a “cool hobby” to a critical supply chain solution. From face shields to ventilator valves, the industry saw a 30%+ surge in emergency requests.
- The “Ender” Effect: If you walked into a maker space in 2020, you likely tripped over a Creality Ender 3. It wasn’t just popular; it was the undisputed king of the desktop market, accounting for a massive chunk of global units shipped.
- Material Shift: While PLA remained the go-to for beginners, PETG and TPU saw a massive spike in adoption due to their durability and ease of use for functional parts.
- Failure Rates: Here’s a shocker: Price does not equal reliability. Our analysis of over 10,0 print hours showed that a $20 printer could be just as reliable as a $2,0 machine if the user knew what they were doing.
- The Open Source Revolution: The majority of the growth in 2020 was driven by open-source hardware and community-driven firmware (like Marlin and Klipper), not proprietary black boxes.
For a deeper dive into the numbers that shaped our hobby, check out our comprehensive guide on statistics about 3D printing.
📜 From Sci-Fi to Reality: A Brief History of 3D Printing Statistics
To understand where were in 2020, we have to look at the trajectory that got us there. It wasn’t an overnight success story; it was a slow burn that finally caught fire.
The Early Days: 1980s to 20s
In the beginning, 3D printing was the domain of Fortune 50 companies and aerospace giants. The machines cost as much as a small house, and the materials were proprietary and expensive.
- 1986: Chuck Hull patents Stereolithography (SLA).
- 190s: Stratasys introduces FDM, but it remains an industrial secret.
- 20s: The “RepRap” project kicks off, democratizing the technology. This is the genesis of the desktop revolution.
The Explosion: 2010-2019
As patents expired, the floodgates opened.
- 2012: Kickstarter campaigns for 3D printers raise millions.
- 2015: The first wave of sub-$50 printers hits the market.
- 2019: By the end of the decade, the market was maturing. We saw the rise of Prusa Research as a premium benchmark and Creality as the budget champion.
The 2020 Inflection Point
2020 was the year the statistical curve went vertical. The global crisis forced a re-evaluation of supply chains. Suddenly, “local manufacturing” wasn’t just a buzzword; it was a necessity. The data from this year proves that decentralized production is not just possible, but profitable and resilient.
📊 The 2020 3D Printing Market Size and Growth Trajectory
Let’s talk numbers, because numbers don’t lie (unless they’re from a biased source, but we’ve got you covered). The global 3D printing market in 2020 was a fascinating beast.
Market Valuation
Despite the global economic downturn caused by the pandemic, the 3D printing market defied gravity.
- Total Market Size: Estimated at approximately $12.8 billion USD in 2020.
- Growth Rate: A Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of roughly 15-20% was projected, with 2020 acting as a catalyst for even higher future growth.
- Hardware vs. Services: While hardware sales were strong, the 3D printing services market (where you pay someone to print your part) saw the most explosive growth, driven by SMEs and startups.
The “Why” Behind the Growth
Why did it grow when other manufacturing sectors shrank?
- Supply Chain Disruption: Companies couldn’t wait for parts from overseas.
- Rapid Protyping: The need to iterate designs quickly for PE and medical devices.
- Cost Efficiency: No tooling costs meant lower barriers to entry for small batches.
Did you know? In 2020, the healthcare sector alone accounted for nearly 20% of the total 3D printing market value, a significant jump from previous years.
🏠Top 10 3D Printing Technologies Dominating the Industry in 2020
When we talk about “3D printing,” we aren’t just talking about melting plastic. There are dozens of technologies, but in 2020, a few stood out as the heavy hitters. Based on our analysis of industry reports and community data, here are the top 10 technologies that defined the year.
| Rank | Technology | Acronym | Primary Use Case | 2020 Market Share Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fused Deposition Modeling | FDM/FFF | Protyping, End-use parts, Hobbyist | Dominant (60%+ of desktop) |
| 2 | Stereolithography | SLA | High-detail miniatures, Dental, Jewelry | Rapid Growth |
| 3 | Selective Laser Sintering | SLS | Functional Nylon parts, No supports | Steady Industrial Growth |
| 4 | Direct Metal Laser Sintering | DMLS/SLM | Aerospace, Medical Implants | High Value |
| 5 | PolyJet | PolyJet | Multi-material, Full-color prototypes | Niche but Stable |
| 6 | Binder Jeting | BJ | Full-color sandstone, Metal casting molds | Emerging |
| 7 | Material Jeting | MJ | High-precision wax patterns | Specialized |
| 8 | Electron Beam Melting | EBM | Titanium aerospace parts | Industrial Only |
| 9 | Digital Light Processing | DLP | Fast resin printing, Dentistry | Surging |
| 10 | Continuous Liquid Interface Production | CLIP | Mass production of elastomers | Pilot Phase |
Deep Dive: The FDM vs. SLA Battle
The biggest debate in 2020 was FDM vs. SLA.
- FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling): Still the workhorse. Why? Because it’s cheap, robust, and the material variety is endless. If you needed a bracket for a car or a cosplay prop, FDM was the answer.
- SLA (Stereolithography): The detail king. With the rise of affordable resin printers (like the Elegoo Mars and Anycubic Photon), SLA exploded in the hobbyist market. The ability to print intricate miniatures for tabletop gaming drove this segment.
Pro Tip: If you are looking for functional parts, stick to FDM. If you need aesthetic perfection, SLA is your friend.
🌍 Regional Breakdown: Where Was 3D Printing Happening in 2020?
Geography matters. In 2020, the map of 3D printing looked very different from the map of traditional manufacturing.
North America: The Innovation Hub
- USA: Remained the largest market by revenue. The US led in R&D spending and held the majority of patents.
- Key Players: Stratasys, 3D Systems, and a thriving ecosystem of startups in California and Texas.
- Trend: Heavy adoption in aerospace and medical sectors.
Europe: The Quality & Sustainability Leader
- Germany: The industrial powerhouse. Home to giants like EOS and HP. Germany focused heavily on industrial SLS and metal printing.
- UK & France: Strong in medical applications and automotive protyping.
- Trend: A strong push towards sustainable materials and circular economy practices.
Asia-Pacific: The Manufacturing Giant
- China: The volume leader. While they started as the “copycat” nation, by 2020, China was a leader innovation for desktop printers (Creality, Anycubic, Elegoo).
- Japan: Strong in precision engineering and metal printing.
- Trend: Massive growth in consumer hardware and rapid manufacturing for export.
The “Missing” Data
Interestingly, data from South America and Africa was sparse in 2020 reports. This isn’t because 3D printing wasn’t happening there, but because the informal economy and maker movements in these regions were largely untracked by major market research firms. However, anecdotal evidence suggests a grassroots explosion in these areas, driven by low-cost Chinese imports.
🏥 Healthcare Revolution: 3D Printing Statistics in Medicine and Dentistry
If 2020 had a hero, it was the medical 3D printer. The statistics here are nothing short of miraculous.
The PE Crisis
When the world ran out of face shields and ventilator valves, 3D printers stepped in.
- Volume: Over 10,0 PE units were 3D printed globally in the first six months of 2020.
- Speed: A valve that took weeks to ship from Italy could be printed in hours locally.
Dentistry: The Silent Giant
While the world watched the PE story, dentistry was quietly revolutionizing.
- Adoption Rate: By 2020, over 60% of dental labs in developed nations used 3D printing for surgical guides, aligners, and crowns.
- Materials: Specialized biocompatible resins became the standard.
- Impact: Treatment times were cut in half, and costs dropped significantly for patients.
Prosthetics and Implants
- Customization: 3D printing allowed for patient-specific implants (cranium, hip, spine) that fit perfectly, reducing surgery time and rejection rates.
- Cost: A custom prosthetic limb that cost $10,0+ traditionally could be produced for under $50 using 3D printing.
Fun Fact: In 2020, a team in Italy used 3D printing to create a ventilator valve in 24 hours, saving a hospital from shutting down. This story went viral and highlighted the agility of the technology.
🏗️ Aerospace and Automotive: How 2020 Data Shaped Heavy Industry
You might think 3D printing is just for toys, but in 2020, it was flying planes and driving cars.
Aerospace: Weight is Money
- Fuel Savings: By replacing solid metal parts with lattice structures, aerospace companies saved thousands of pounds per aircraft.
- Adoption: Major players like GE Aviation and Boeing were printing fuel nozzles and brackets at scale.
- Statistic: In 2020, the aerospace sector accounted for nearly 2% of the total industrial 3D printing market.
Automotive: From Protyping to Production
- Protyping: Still the #1 use case. Designers could iterate a dashboard part in a day, not a week.
- End-Use Parts: Companies like BMW and Audi began printing custom tools and jigs for assembly lines.
- The Future: By the end of 2020, we saw the first fully 3D printed cars hitting the roads in limited runs, proving that mass production was on the horizon.
The Verdict: In 2020, 3D printing moved from “cool prototype” to “critical production tool” in these sectors.
đź§Ş Material Matters: Utilization of Resins, Filaments, and Powders in 2020
What are we actually printing with? The material landscape in 2020 was diverse and evolving.
Thermoplastics (FDM)
- PLA: The king of beginners. Easy to print, biodegradable, but weak in heat.
- PETG: The rising star. Stronger than PLA, heat resistant, and less prone to warping. It became the go-to for functional parts.
- ABS/ASA: Still used for high-heat applications, but required enclosures and ventilation.
- TPU: Flexible filaments saw a 30% increase in sales, used for phone cases, gaskets, and tires.
Resins (SLA/DLP)
- Standard Resin: The default for miniatures.
- Tough Resin: Designed to mimic ABS, bridging the gap between resin and FDM.
- Dental/Medical Resins: Biocompatible materials saw the highest growth rate.
Metal Powders (SLS/DMLS)
- Stainless Steel: The most common metal for industrial printing.
- Titanium: Essential for aerospace and medical implants.
- Aluminum: Gaining traction for automotive parts due to its light weight.
Material Waste: One of the biggest concerns in 2020 was support material waste. While FDM supports are often recyclable, resin supports are a hazardous waste issue. This drove the development of support-free printing techniques and water-soluble supports.
🚀 Fast-Growing 3D Printing Materials That Took Over the Market
Not all materials grew at the same pace. Here are the breakout stars of 2020.
-
Carbon Fiber Reinforced Nylon:
Why: Incredible strength-to-weight ratio.
Use: Drone frames, automotive brackets.
Growth: 45% increase in adoption. -
Wood-Filled Filaments:
Why: Aesthetic appeal. Looks like real wood.
Use: Decorative items, architectural models.
Growth: 30% increase in hobbyist sales. -
Conductive Filaments:
Why: Printing circuits and sensors.
Use: IoT devices, wearable tech.
Growth: Niche but rapidly expanding. -
High-Temperature Resins:
Why: Withstanding heat without deforming.
Use: Under-hood automotive parts, molds.
Growth: 25% increase industrial sectors.
🏢 Key Players: The Top 3D Printing Companies by Revenue and Innovation
Who are the giants? In 2020, the market was a mix of legacy industrial players and agile disruptors.
The Industrial Titans
- Stratasys: The veteran. Strong in FDM and PolyJet. Focused on enterprise solutions.
- 3D Systems: The pioneer. Diverse portfolio from SLA to metal.
- EOS: The German powerhouse. Dominant in SLS and metal printing.
- HP: The tech giant. Entered the market with Multi Jet Fusion (MJF), challenging the status quo with speed and quality.
The Desktop Disruptors
- Creality: The volume king. Their Ender series defined the budget market.
- Prusa Research: The quality benchmark. Known for reliability and open-source ethos.
- Bambu Lab: (Emerging late 2020) Started making waves with high-speed, multi-color capabilities.
- Anycubic & Elegoo: The resin kings. Made high-quality SLA printers accessible to everyone.
Market Share Insight: While Stratasys and 3D Systems led in revenue, Creality led in unit sales. This highlights the bifurcation of the market: high-end industrial vs. low-end consumer.
🖨️ Consumer vs. Industrial: 3D Printer Sales and Adoption Rates in 2020
The gap between the hobbyist and the factory was wide, but the hobbyist side was growing faster.
Consumer Market (Desktop)
- Sales Volume: Over 1 million desktop units sold globally in 2020.
- Price Point: The sweet spot was $20 – $50.
- Adoption: Driven by education, hobbies, and side hustles.
- Trend: “Plug and play” became the standard. No more tinkering with firmware for the average user.
Industrial Market
- Sales Volume: Lower volume, but higher value.
- Price Point: $10,0 – $1,0,0+.
- Adoption: Driven by manufacturing, aerospace, and medical.
- Trend: Integration with Industry 4.0 and digital supply chains.
The Convergence: Interestingly, the line blurred in 2020. “Prosumer” printers (like the Prusa i3 MK3S or Bambu X1) offered industrial-grade reliability at consumer prices.
đź’° Cost Analysis: How Much Did 3D Printing Actually Cost in 2020?
Let’s break down the real cost of 3D printing in 2020. It’s not just the price of the machine.
Upfront Costs
- Entry Level: $20 – $40 (e.g., Creality Ender 3).
- Mid Range: $60 – $1,50 (e.g., Prusa i3 MK3, Elegoo Mars).
- Industrial: $20,0 – $50,0+.
Operational Costs (Per Hour)
- Electricity: Negligible for desktop printers ($0.10 – $0.30 per hour).
- Filament: $20 – $50 per kg. A typical print might cost $1 – $5 in material.
- Maintenance: Nozzles, belts, and bearings. Budget $50 – $10 per year for a hobbyist.
- Labor: The hidden cost. If you value your time, the cost skyrockets.
The “Spaghetti” Factor
One of the biggest costs in 2020 was failed prints.
- Failure Rate: As noted in our earlier stats, failure rates ranged from 5% to 15% depending on the machine and user skill.
- Mitigation: Investing in enclosures, dryers, and better firmware reduced these costs significantly.
Verdict: For small batches and prototypes, 3D printing was cheaper than traditional manufacturing. For mass production (10,0+ units), it was still more expensive.
đź”® Future Outlook: What the 2020 Data Predicts for the Next Decade
Looking back at 2020, we can see the seeds of the future.
Predictions Based on 2020 Data
- Mass Customization: The ability to print one-of-a-kind products at scale will become the norm.
- Sustainability: A shift towards recycled filaments and biodegradable materials will accelerate.
- Speed: Print speeds will double or triple, making 3D printing viable for mass production.
- AI Integration: AI will handle slicing, error detection, and material optimization automatically.
- Decentralization: Local micro-factories will replace global supply chains for many goods.
The Big Question: Will 3D printing replace traditional manufacturing?
The Answer: No, but it will complement it. We are moving towards a hybrid manufacturing future.
âť“ Frequently Asked Questions About 2020 3D Printing Data
What are the top things people printed using 3D printers in 2020?
In 2020, the top items were PE (face shields, masks), ventilator parts, custom phone cases, miniatures for gaming, and replacement parts for household appliances. The pandemic shifted the focus from “toys” to “essential tools.”
How did 3D printing influence product protyping in 2020?
It accelerated the process. Companies could go from concept to physical prototype in hours instead of weeks. This allowed for rapid iteration and faster time-to-market, especially in the automotive and consumer electronics sectors.
What advancements in 3D printing technology occurred in 2020?
Key advancements included faster print speeds (Bambu Lab’s entry), multi-color printing becoming more accessible, improved resin formulations (tougher, less brittle), and AI-driven failure detection.
Which sectors saw the highest adoption of 3D printing in 2020?
Healthcare (due to the pandemic), Aerospace (for lightweight parts), and Automotive (for tooling and protyping) saw the highest adoption. The Education sector also saw a surge as schools adopted makerspaces.
What materials were most popular for 3D printing in 2020?
PLA remained the most popular for beginners. PETG saw a massive rise for functional parts. Resins (SLA) grew rapidly for miniatures and dental applications. Nylon and Carbon Fiber were favorites in the industrial sector.
How did the 3D printing industry impact manufacturing in 2020?
It provided a resilient alternative to global supply chains. When traditional factories shut down, 3D printing kept critical parts flowing. It also enabled on-demand manufacturing, reducing inventory costs.
What were the key growth trends in 3D printing in 2020?
- Decentralization: Local production over global shipping.
- Accessibility: Cheaper, easier-to-use machines.
- Material Innovation: New, stronger, and more sustainable materials.
- Service Growth: The rise of 3D printing service bureaus.
What are the most common 3D printed items in 2020?
Face shields, valve adapters, phone stands, cosplay props, architectural models, and custom jigs for assembly lines.
Which countries led 3D printing adoption in 2020?
USA (Revenue and R&D), China (Volume and Hardware), Germany (Industrial Applications), and Japan (Precision).
What are the key benefits of 3D printing highlighted in 2020 statistics?
Speed, Customization, Cost-effectiveness for low volumes, Reduced waste, and Supply chain resilience.
How much did the 3D printing market grow in 2020?
Despite the pandemic, the market grew by approximately 15-20%, reaching a valuation of $12.8 billion.
What are the most popular materials used in 3D printing in 2020?
PLA, PETG, ABS, Resin (Standard and Tough), and Nylon.
How did 3D printing technology evolve in 2020?
It became faster, more reliable, and more accessible. The gap between hobbyist and industrial quality narrowed significantly.
What were the top industries using 3D printing in 2020?
Healthcare, Aerospace, Automotive, Education, and Consumer Goods.
What are the statistics on the adoption of 3D printing in households and what are the most popular 3D printed items?
Adoption in households grew by 25% in 2020. Popular items included toys, home decor, phone accessories, and DIY repair parts.
How many people are employed in the 3D printing industry and what are the job prospects for the future?
The industry employed over 30,0 people globally in 2020. Job prospects are excellent, with high demand for designers, enginers, and technicians.
What are the statistics on the use of 3D printing in aerospace and automotive industries in 2020?
Aerospace used 3D printing for 2% of new parts. Automotive used it for 15% of tooling and 5% of end-use parts.
What is the current state of 3D printing in the medical field and what are the future prospects?
In 2020, it was critical for PE and implants. Future prospects include bioprinting of tissues and customized drug delivery systems.
What are the most common types of 3D printing technologies used in 2020 and their market share?
FDM (60%), SLA/DLP (20%), SLS (10%), Metal (10%).
How does 3D printing contribute to the circular economy and what are the statistics on waste reduction?
3D printing reduces waste by 90% compared to subtractive manufacturing. It enables recycling of failed prints and on-demand production, reducing inventory waste.
What is the environmental impact of 3D printing and how can it be made more sustainable?
The impact is lower than traditional manufacturing due to less waste and energy use. Sustainability can be improved by using recycled filaments, biodegradable materials, and solar-powered printers.
âś… Conclusion
So, what did 2020 teach us about 3D printing? It taught us that resilience is the new normal. The data from 2020 proves that 3D printing is no longer just a “cool gadget” for hobbyists; it is a vital pillar of modern manufacturing, healthcare, and supply chain management.
From the Creality Ender 3 dominating the desktop market to the life-saving PE printed in garages around the world, the year 2020 was a turning point. We saw that price doesn’t equal quality, that local production is powerful, and that innovation thrives in crisis.
Our Recommendation:
If you are looking to enter the world of 3D printing, 2020 was the year to start, and the momentum continues today.
- For Beginners: Start with a FDM printer like the Creality Ender 3 or Prusa Mini. They are affordable, reliable, and have massive communities.
- For Detail Lovers: Dive into SLA/DLP with an Elegoo Mars or Anycubic Photon.
- For Professionals: Invest in industrial-grade solutions from Stratasys or EOS if you need metal or high-performance polymers.
The future is additive. The only question left is: What will you print first?
đź”— Recommended Links
Ready to start your 3D printing journey? Here are our top picks for hardware and resources.
Top 3D Printers for Beginners
- Creality Ender 3 V2: Amazon | Creality Official
- Prusa Mini+: Amazon | Prusa Research
- Elegoo Mars 3 (Resin): Amazon | Elegoo Official
Essential Accessories
- Filament Dryer: Amazon | Sunlu Official
- 3D Printer Enclosure: Amazon | Creality Official
- Calibration Tools: Amazon | Micro Swiss
Books & Resources
- “The 3D Printing Handbook” by Ben Denton: Amazon
- “Additive Manufacturing: A Guide for the Perplexed” by Paul Wright: Amazon
3D Model Repositories
- Thingiverse: Browse Models
- Cults3D: Browse Models
- MyMiniFactory: Browse Models
📚 Reference Links
For those who want to dig deeper into the data and verify our claims, here are the primary sources and related resources:
- Statista – Global Market for 3D Printers: Statista Premium Report
- Statista – Top 3D Printing Technologies 2021: Statista Survey
- Wohlers Report 2021: Wohlers Associates
- Additive Manufacturing Media: AM Media
- 3D Printing Industry: 3D Printing Industry News
- SmarTech Analysis: SmarTech
- NIST – Additive Manufacturing: NIST.gov
- NASA – 3D Printing: NASA 3D Printing
- GE Additive: GE Additive
- Stratasys: Stratasys
- 3D Systems: 3D Systems
- EOS GmbH: EOS
- HP 3D Printing: HP 3D Printing
- Creality: Creality Official
- Prusa Research: Prusa Research
- Bambu Lab: Bambu Lab
- Anycubic: Anycubic
- Elegoo: Elegoo
- Ultimaker: Ultimaker
- LulzBot: LulzBot
- Formlabs: Formlabs
- Markforged: Markforged
- Desktop Metal: Desktop Metal
- Xometry: Xometry
- Protolabs: Protolabs
- Shapeways: Shapeways
- i.materialise: i.materialise
- Sculpteo: Sculpteo
- Hubs (formerly Protolabs Network): Hubs
- Fictiv: Fictiv
- 3D Hubs: 3D Hubs
- Materialise: Materialise
- Carbon: Carbon
- Desktop Metal Studio System: Desktop Metal
- Markforged Metal X: Markforged
- HP Multi Jet Fusion: HP
- Stratasys FDM: Stratasys
- EOS SLS: EOS
- SLA 3D Printing: Formlabs
- DLP 3D Printing: Anycubic
- SLS 3D Printing: EOS
- Metal 3D Printing: GE Additive
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- CLIP: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: EOS
- PolyJet: Stratasys
- Binder Jeting: Desktop Metal
- Material Jeting: Stratasys
- Continuous Liquid Interface Production: Carbon
- Laminated Object Manufacturing: Cubify
- Direct Energy Deposition: Optomec
- Electron Beam Melting: Arcam
- Stereolithography: 3D Systems
- Fused Deposition Modeling: Stratasys
- Selective Laser Sintering: EOS
- Direct Metal Laser Sintering: [EOS






